Essay on Documentary Critique - 952 Words

This is a critique ofquot; Roger And Mequot;, a documentary by Michael Moore. This is a film about a city that at one time had a great economy. The working class people lived the American dream. The majority of people in this town worked at the large GM factory. The factory is what gave these people security in their middle working class home life. Life in the city of Flint was good until Roger Smith the CEO of GM decided to close the factory. This destroyed the city. Violent crime became the highest in the nation, businesses went bankrupt, people were evicted from their rented homes. There were no jobs and no opportunity. Life was so bad that Money magazine named Flint the worst place to live in the entire nation. When news of the†¦show more content†¦The city is doing so bad that the rat population actually increased the human. These comments made me sick because he actually believed what he was saying. The well to do or very rich people in Flint had different statements b ut they were just as disturbing. quot;Get up and do somethingquot;, quot;They don’t want to workquot;, quot;We have such a good welfare program these daysquot; and quot;there being lazyquot; were just some of the comments. These people just seemed really naive to me. I got the impression, and I am confidant that their families has had money for years and that they were brought up on this type of attitude. The sheriff of the city was interviewed as he evicted people from their homes. He said he was so backed up with evictions that he had to kick people out of their homes on Christmas eve. So many people were leaving this town that people getting evicted couldn’t call a moving truck. All of these interviews shows the depth of the entire story, not just one side. Roger Smith was finally asked at the end of the film what he thought of people being out in the street in Flint. He said that it had nothing to do with GM. The director’s choice of authorial voice certainly impacted my feelings about the film. The director showed all sides of the story but anyone who watches this film will side with the city of Flint. One reason for this was showing the archive footage of theShow MoreRelatedBill Nichols and the Discourse of Sobriety2932 Words   |  12 Pagessobriety’? Throughout film history, documentary and fiction films have denoted the polar opposites of film form with each representing two distinct and separate traditions, the cinema of reality and the cinema of fiction (Doherty 16). However what was once a clear distinction has become blurred as the increasing popularity of mockumentary continues to weaken the assumed boundaries between fact and fiction (Sicinski). Prior to this ‘blurring of the lines’ the documentary genre enjoyed a privileged positionRead MoreHow Do Documentaries Produce ‘Truth Effects’? Essay1379 Words   |  6 PagesHow Do Documentaries Produce ‘Truth Effects’? The role of media has often been a subject of much debate, particularly in terms of its role in portraying and conveying truth to the target audience. Some argue upon its utility as a means to disseminate information and to rectify perceptions and facts in the minds of the viewers; while others squabble on the amount of misrepresentation which is often adopted by media as a means to project baseless arguments which lead to severe impact on the minds,Read MoreExit Through The Gift Shop Analysis1722 Words   |  7 Pagesas an anthropology or documentary is inherently difficult; the task involves portraying the beauties, flaws, nuances, and relevancies of an often under-appreciated movement in a finite amount of space. A documentary, already tasked with capturing the intricacies of a movement, also requires capturing this spirit in a neutral, fact-oriented, honest, yet still entertaining fashion. Banksy’s Exit Through the Gift Shop is widely considered an example of a successful documentary on street art due to itsRead MorePhotography And The Carnegie Museum Of Natural History1218 Words   |  5 Pagescreates books and exhibits to educate a mass public audience about social problems without minimizing their complexity.† I think these two quotes from the article really add too it and explain. Those as photographers, especially photojournalists and documentary photographers, have to shoot their work, without creating any biases within their work. Like the photographers that are apart of Women of Vision said to us they have to learn and submerge themselves in a culture and learn about these people andRead MoreThe s The House Is Black2141 Words   |  9 PagesForugh Farrokhzad’s The House is Black is a harrowing, disturbing, artfully made documentary, one of the few films directed by the Iranian poet Farrokhzad. Her subject here is leprosy, and she looks directly, uncompromisingly, at the devastation that this disease causes the human body. Sh e does not look away, not from the cruelest deformations this disease generates. Her purpose was to expose the punishing and superfluous way that lepers continued to be treated in Iran, funneled into quarantinedRead MoreThe Bible Is No Different1898 Words   |  8 PagesWonders of the world often collaborate to create timeless pieces of art; the Bible is no different. The Documentary Hypothesis proposes this same ideology of the Bible. Past scholars have devoted countless years determining the origin or sacred text. This particular source critique aims to understand the theory of multiple authors and publications to comprise the Pentateuch, Torah, or Old Testament. In Recent Scholarship on the Pentateuch, some scholars struggle with the methodological questionRead MoreThe Film Kony 2012 and Invisible Children3099 Words   |  13 Pagesmillion views in a single day and since has gathered almost over 99 million view on YouTube. The campaign was a 30-minute video made by filmmaker and Invisible Children co-founder Jason Russell can be considered a political documentary by traditional standards. The political documentary intended to persuade bystander viewers to hold certain beliefs about Kony, a leader of the rebel militia group the Lord’s Resistance Army in Uganda. Viewers were asked to act immediately to raise awareness through socialRead MoreUse Of Film As A Propaganda Tool3428 Words   |  14 Pagesradio and television contributed to this new era, offering their unique characteristics for exploitation. In this essay, I am going to focus on the particular use of film as a propaganda tool. A propaganda film, can take either the form of a documentary film production or a fictional screenplay that aims at convincing the audience about certain issues. They can be driven by politics, social conflicts, environmental problems or simply personal incentives. Propagandistic content in films can be realisticRead MoreBra Boys - a Documentary Case Study1696 Words   |  7 PagesBra Boys Practice Essay Documentaries reinforce or criticise dominant representations of groups in society. Discuss in relation to a documentary you have studied. Images are a complex communication tool – the intention of the creator and the interpretation of the viewer may not be harmonizing. While Bra Boys seeks to criticise their infamous reputation as an anti-social and law-breaking gang, the construction of the documentary has reinforced that dominant representation of the surf group. SunnyRead MoreAn Ethnography Of Wall Street986 Words   |  4 Pagespositions are white males while those in lower positions tend to be more females. As discussed in the documentary Inside Job, the males in corporations featured tended to be impulsive risk takers which can be related to the idea of â€Å"doing masculinity†. Using these sources, one is able to create a critique of the theory emancipation in accordance to corporate crime. Through the analysis of the documentary Inside Job and the article An Ethnography of Wall Street, it can be determined that corporations are

The Machiavellian Struggle in Spain and England during the...

The time of the reformation was a time of heavy politics, political wars, and religious attacks and conflicts. This was a period of growth for some countries, such as England, and a time of decline for other countries like Spain. These two particular countries, England and Spain, had two very powerful rulers who helped determine the fate of their nations. Phillip II of Spain was born into a very powerful family of extremely Machiavellian heritage. He had control of the Netherlands, Spain, parts of the North and South Americas, and parts of Asia and Brazil. He was also extremely Catholic and loyal to the Catholic Church. Queen Elizabeth I of England inherited a small country divided between Lutherans and Catholics, but she would turn out to be one of the greatest rulers of England in history. These two rulers would go head to head until their deaths, and while England rose up, Spain began to decline. Although Phillip II of Spain was a very Machiavellian ruler, Elizabeth I of En gland was much more Machiavellian, for Phillip of Spain was not governed by necessity, as Machiavelli advised; he was feared by his subjects, not loved; and Queen Elizabeth I of England was an effective ruler and near perfect example of the Machiavellian Prince. Phillip, though a great ruler, did not allow his actions to be governed by necessity, but rather his religious ambitions. Phillip, His Most Catholic Majesty, was very serious about religion. When the Dutch, within his empire, beganShow MoreRelatedInstitution as the Fundamental Cause of Long Tern Growth39832 Words   |  160 Pagesclarify these notions before commenting on some of the underlying assumptions and discussing comparative statics. Consider the development of property rights in Europe during the Middle Ages. There is no doubt that lack of property rights for landowners, merchants and proto- industrialists was detrimental to economic growth during this epoch. Since political institutions at the time placed politi cal power in the hands of kings and various types of hereditary monarchies, 6 such rights were largely

Tobacco Smoking and Legal Marijuana free essay sample

The Effects of Marijuana Smoke There are many reasons why marijuana is  not  worse for you than smoking cigarettes. You may have heard that â€Å"one joint is equal to ten cigarettes† but this is exaggerated and misleading. Marijuana does contain more tar than tobacco — but low tar cigarettes cause just as much cancer, so what is that supposed to mean? Scientists have hown that smoking any plant is bad for your lungs, because it increases the number of ‘lesions’ in your small airways. This usually does not threaten your life, but there is a chance it will lead to infections. Marijuana users who are worried about this can find less harmful ways of taking marijuana like eating or vaporizing. (Be careful – marijuana is safe to eat — but tobacco is not, you might overdose! )  Marijuana does not cause cancer  the way tobacco does, though. Here is a list of interesting facts about marijuana smoking and tobacco smoking: o Marijuana smokers generally don’t chain smoke, nd so they smoke less. (Marijuana is not physically addictive like tobacco. ) The more potent marijuana is, the less a smoker will use at a time. o Tobacco contains nicotine, and marijuana doesn’t. Nicotine may harden the arteries and may be responsible for much of the heart disease caused by tobacco. New research has found that it may also cause a lot of the cancer in tobacco smokers and people who live or work where tobacco is smoked. This is because it breaks down into a cancer causing chemical called `N Nitrosamine’ when it is burned (and maybe even while it is inside the body as well. o Marijuana contains THC. THC is a bronchial dilator, which means it works like a cough drop and opens up your lungs, which aids clearance of smoke and dirt. Nicotine does just the opposite; it makes your lungs bunch up and makes it harder to cough anything up. o There are benefits from marijuana (besides bronchial dilation) that you don’t get from tobacco. Mainly, marijuana makes you relax, which improves your health and well-being. o  Scientists do not really know what it is that causes malignant lung cancer in tobacco. Many think it may be a substance known as Lead 210. Of course, there are many other theories as to what does cause cancer, but if this is true, it is easy to see why  no case of lung cancer resulting from marijuana use alone has ever been documented, because tobacco contains much more of this substance than marijuana. o Marijuana laws make it harder to use marijuana without damaging your body. Water-pipes are illegal in many states. Filtered cigarettes, vaporizers, and inhalers have to be mass produced, which is hard to arrange `underground. ’ People don’t eat marijuana often because you need more to get as high that way, nd it isn’t cheap or easy to get (which is the reason why some people will stoop to smoking leaves. ) This may sound funny to you — but  the more legal marijuana gets, the safer it is. It is pretty obvious to users that marijuana prohibition laws are not â€Å"for their own good. † In addition to the above, legal marijuana would be clean and free from adulterants. Some people add other drugs to marijuana before they sell it. Some people spray room freshener on it or soak in in chemicals like formaldehyde! A lot of the marijuana is grown outdoors, where it may be sprayed with esticides or contaminated with dangerous fungi. If the government really cared about our health, they would form an agency which would make sure only quality marijuana was sold. This would be cheaper than keeping it illegal, and it would keep people from getting hurt and going to the emergency room. (source) FACT: Studies have shown that smoking marijuana does NOT increase your chance of getting cancer and may even lower it slightly! Of course, vaping or eating cannabis are still considered the sa fest methods of ingestion especially for daily consumers. Early on, when our research appeared as if there would be a negative impact on lung health, I was opposed to legalization because I thought it would lead to increased use and that would lead to increased health effects,† Tashkin says. â€Å"But at this point, I’d be in favor of legalization. Tobacco smoking causes far more harm. And in terms of an intoxicant, alcohol causes far more harm. UCLA’s Tashkin studied heavy marijuana smokers to determine whether the use led to increased risk of lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or COPD. He hypothesized that there would be a definitive link between cancer and marijuana smoking, but the results proved otherwise. â€Å"What we found instead was no association and even a suggestion of some protective effect,† says Tashkin, whose research was the largest case-control study ever conducted. Listen to Tashkin’s full video  here UPDATE Source  A new study, published in this month’s  Journal of the American Medical Association, tested the lung function of over 5,000 young adults between 18 and 30. After 20 years of testing, researchers found some buzzworthy results:  regular marijuana smokers (defined by up to a joint a day for seven years) had no discernible impairment in lung activity from non-smokers. In fact, researchers were surprised to find marijuana smokers performed slightly better than both smokers and non-smokers on the lung performance test. Why? The most likely explanation seems to be that the act of inhaling marijuana—holding each puff in for as long as possible—is a lot like a pulmonary function test, giving marijuana smokers an edge over their igarette smoking counterparts. For most of human existence, cannabis has been considered a medicine. Queen Victoria used it to alleviate her menstrual cramps.

Wenger, Zimmerman, Engestrom Views on Human Resource Development

Contrasting Views about Learning In essence, there are various differences on learning methodologies as discussed by the three authors. After analysing the three articles written by the different scholars, it is evident that they emphasize different methodologies of learning.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Wenger, Zimmerman, Engestrom’ Views on Human Resource Development specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More This emphasis is an indication that the three authors consider the respective methodologies with a certain weight. As such, a learning methodology is one of the outstanding differences when it comes to their perspectives on learning. First, Zimmerman (2000) gave a special attention to the concept of self-efficacy and the motivation it availed to learners. In his work, Zimmerman indicated that self-efficacy had evoked crucial and vast concern over the last ten years. In this case, he termed self-efficacy as the most proficient predictor of academic success and a source of inspiration. In addition, the author differentiated this concept evidently as the superior tool of measurement over other evaluators such as self-concept as well as the locus of control. From a critical point of view, it is evident that the researcher considers the concept as the most proficient evaluation mechanism. In addition, it implies that the author considers motivation as an essential ingredient of academic success. In fact, he stated that the students’ attitude towards their capability affects their actual academic outcome. In that regard, therefore, it cannot be disputed that Zimmerman paid more attention to motivation and self-efficacy than other methodologies of learning and evaluation. This focus is very different from the considerations and exemplification of Wenger (2000) and Engestrom (2001) as illustrated in their works. In particular, Wenger (2000) viewed learning from an organizational and a pretty collective perspective.Advertising Looking for essay on business economics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Unlike Zimmerman (2000), the author did not discuss or consider learning as an individual venture but a group-based undertaking. In the same light, he did not share the idea that individual motivation was the key determinant of successful skill acquisition. Instead, he indicated that the capability of people to learn and acquire new skills as well as increase their body of knowledge was determined by their ability to conceive social learning system. From a critical point of view, he believed that learning could not be separated from the socialization and interactional characteristic of human beings. In fact, the study provided a social-based definition of learning in order to portray the idea of a systematic approach. In that regard, it became evident that learning occured only when the people were willing to ta ke part in the group’s activities. Importantly, unlike Zimmerman and Engestrom, Wenger indicated that learning occurred within the limits of the social circles. While expounding on this aspect, the author revealed that learning was obtained from communities of practice which were defined by boundary processes in the social context. In turn, the communities of practice shaped the identity of each participant in accordance to the role they played when interacting with each other. As such, it could be implied that Wenger viewed learning as part of a common life process. He did not treat life as something less than its course. Unlike Zimmerman and Engerstrom, he focused on the bigger picture as far as learning was concerned. This aspect was based on the fact that the skills were acquired mostly from other people. As such, we must interact first before learning from them and acquiring new skills as well as bodies of knowledge. In contrast to the approach used by Zimmerman and Weng er, Engerstrom approached the methodology of learning from a theoretical perspective. Although he shared a similar focus with Wenger due to the organizational approach to learning, he did not share the idea of learning as part of the broad social systems.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Wenger, Zimmerman, Engestrom’ Views on Human Resource Development specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Instead, the author focused on how cultural-historical activity theory was applied in organizational learning. As such, it was evident that he combined the idea of organizational learning with the challenges incurred during the application of cultural-historical theory. In a nutshell, the cross-cultural theory is concerned with the manner in which people’s thoughts are connected with their actions. In this regard, it states that every learning venture must answer the following questions. Who is learning? What are they learning? How do they learn? Why are they learning? This attribute implies that the author views education from multifaceted perspectives which is achieved in the presence of the subject, lesson, rationale, and means of acquiring skills in regard to either organizational or individual perspectives. From this perspective, therefore, the author differs with the two authors profoundly even though he seems to agree with Wenger that learning is part of the interactional day-to-day life where people learn from each other. Comparative Views about Learning Although all the perspectives presented by the authors are essentially different, it is evident that there are some similarities existing from the manner in which they view learning. Importantly, it is clear that all the authors accept the importance of the learner in the process of acquiring skills. All of them attach some importance on the involvement of the subject in unique and diverse ways. Zimmerman indicated that learning depende d on self-efficacy. In this case, he expounded that the level of an individual’s motivation affected their output on performance and skills’ acquisition. As such, it is evident that this author appreciates and attaches the importance of the learner’s attitudes in the process of acquiring skills. Wenger, on the other hand, focused on the use of social systems in the process of learning. In that regard, the interactional and cross-sharing of information becomes a critical aspect in his perspective of learning.Advertising Looking for essay on business economics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Although such groups are the pertinent factor of learning in his view, it is clear that the social learning systems are made of individual people. The author argued that the interaction among individuals gave them identity according to their roles in the groups. This factor implies that the learner or the learning groups play a fundamentally vital role in the entire process. In addition, it means that the author values this important aspect of learning and recognizes its high significance. Lastly, Engestrom (2001) also indicated and appreciated the importance of the learner in the process of skills acquisition but in a hidden and unique way. However, a close look at the exemplifications that were provided showed that he had considered this factor extensively. In particular, he indicated that every learning theory must answer several questions. Among those questions, the first inquiry investigated the subject of learning and answered the issue of who was learning. Implications of Abo ve Perspectives in Human Resource Development The three perspectives can be used to facilitate effective learning in organizations. In fact, the combination of the three methodologies can provide organizations with the opportunity to make critical progress on acquisition of skills. First, the social learning systems make critical implications on the organizational management and administration. In essence, the organizations can use social learning for the sake of acquiring more skills. This cross-sharing makes the teams acquire the capability of innovations and development of new ideas. In addition, self-efficacy and individual motivation can be applied to provide an inspirational environment in the organization. In essence, motivation is an important aspect since it determines the output of an individual. In turn, the output of the individual employees encourages them to learn and acquire skills to facilitate better performance. As a result, the organization should first cultivate individual motivation before proceeding to nurture the acquisition of collective skills. Having nurtured the motivation and self-efficacy of the organizational members, the administrators can implement the idea of Wenger (2000). In order to recall, Wenger stated that learning takes place in the form of social systems where people interact and enlighten each other. With this in mind, the organizations can apply this principle to help in the acquisition of skills. As such, if the author believes that learning can take place through well-organized social systems, companies can adopt a team-based learning system. In fact, this can translate to the use of inter-professional learning model. In this model, different professionals interact and share their skills. This attribute is fulfilled by the cross-sharing of information in order to solve specific problem. As such, they use multidimensional knowledge and skills in order to solve the same problem. More Useful Perspectives at Work Althou gh the three authors present valid arguments to explain their perspectives about learning, there are some views that resonate with the organization’s setup more than others. In the working environment, the social system aspect is very important on the acquisition of skills. In this case, the perspectives argue that learning occurs when human beings interact and share information to increase the knowledge base. In essence, this is more relevant perspective when it comes to organization. This relevance is occasioned by the fact that organizations are dependant to the process by which its employees interact and share knowledge. Importantly, the innovation capability of an organization is based on the intensity of cross-sharing. If an organization is able to make departments and individuals work together in the spirit of harmony, there is a very high chance of making the necessary progress in learning. In essence, the community of practice and community boundaries also play a fun damental role in the process of learning in organizations. The motivational perspective is also very important to the organization’s performance bearing in mind the importance of personal commitment to work. In this case, it is important to understand that although organizations operate in terms of teams and groups, the unit components include individuals. In addition, the performance of the individuals determines the entire output of the organizations (Lamberson 2010). As such, this aspect of self-efficacy plays a fundamental role in the coordination of the organizational teams to achieve their goals as per the time and terms stipulated. Therefore, the combination of social learning systems and concept of self-efficacy becomes one of the most crucial pairs of learning strategies. In this regard, the overall effect is the conception of well-coordinated teams that can collaborate easily and make the necessary outcomes. References Engestrà ¶m, Y 2001, â€Å"Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization†, Journal of Education and Work, vol. 14, no. 1, pp.133-156. Lamberson, P 2010, â€Å"Social Learning in Social Networks†, The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 132. Wenger, E 2000, â€Å"Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems†, Organization, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 225-246. Zimmerman, B 2000, â€Å"Self-Efficacy: An Essential Motive To Learn†, Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 82-91. This essay on Wenger, Zimmerman, Engestrom’ Views on Human Resource Development was written and submitted by user BruceBanner to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

Fieldtrip The Stonehenge Landscape

The Best Colleges With Low GPA Requirements

The Best Colleges With Low GPA Requirements SAT / ACT Prep Online Guides and Tips Do you have a low GPA? Are you wondering what colleges you can get into despite your low GPA? Out of all the schools in the country, we've compiled a complete list of colleges with low GPA requirements and ranked the best ones. Even if you have a low GPA, that doesn't mean a great education is out of reach for you. Keep reading to figure out what your options are for higher education. The Big Picture: What You Can Do With a Low GPA If you are looking at your low GPA with worry, let us reassure you: you can absolutely get a great education no matter what college you end up going to. For example, did you know that the vast majorityof people profiled in Forbes Magazine’s list of â€Å"30 under 30† (basically a list of about 450 young entrepreneurs, artists, and inventors who are making a name for themselves in a bunch of different fields) went to their local or state college? And not only that, but most of them actually found their business partners there as well! // Yes, the old line is totally true: it’s up to you to make the most of where you are. How? Well, for one, you can research classes and professors by asking your advisors and friends or by looking at online reviews. No matter where they teach, most professors tend to love their subject- after all, they’ve devoted their whole life to studying it!- so seek them out during office hours. Trust me, they'll love to talk with you! Now, let us show you the many choices and possibilities open to you, even if you didn't put your best foot forward in high school. Read on to learn about the following: Colleges that have alternative applications, some of which do not even require a transcript University systems in which you can transfer from one campus to another Great state schools with less competitive admission requirements // What's a Low GPA for College? First, we should clarify what we mean by a low GPA. The definition of a low GPA depends heavily on your personal goals and target colleges, but a general rule of thumb is that any GPA below a 3.0 puts you in the lower range for most colleges in the country. It's true that a 3.0 is the average GPA in the country, but remember that many high school students also don't go to college. Thus, the ones who do go to college usually end up having higher GPAs. As you'll see below, the average GPA of lower-tier colleges is in the 2.9-3.3 range. GPA can also be complicated because of unweighted and weighted GPAs, and how colleges consider the difficulty of your coursework. Even if you have a low GPA, you can compensate for it if you took a difficult course load, as colleges will reward you for your academic ambition. // Here are a few guides you might want to check out as you read this article: What Is a Good GPA? What's a Bad GPA for College? What's the Average High School GPA? How Do I Apply to College With a Low GPA? Finally, keep in mind that even with a low GPA, you still have a great shot at getting into college if you do well on the SAT/ACT. If a low GPA doesn't represent your academic potential well, you can show colleges your true ability through tests that are standardized throughout the country. Maybe your GPA is hiding you behind a mask? Want to build the best possible college application, to compensate for a lower GPA? We can help. PrepScholar Admissions is the world's best admissions consulting service. We combine world-class admissions counselors with our data-driven, proprietary admissions strategies. We've overseen thousands of students get into their top choice schools, from state colleges to the Ivy League. We know what kinds of students colleges want to admit. We want to get you admitted to your dream schools. Learn more about PrepScholar Admissions to maximize your chance of getting in. Does Your GPA Not Show the Real You? // If you have a low GPA but know that you are capable of so much more, three colleges now give you a totally different way to apply! Goucher College: How about this for a revolutionary idea: you only submit a two-minute video about yourself. That's it. No transcript, no test scores- just you explaining why you deserve admission. Bennington College: Similar deal here in that there's no need to submit a transcript or test scores. Instead, you'll turn in a self-curated collection of your work that speaks to your creative and intellectual abilities. Bard College: Even though Bard still requires a transcript, you can opt to answer several college-level essay questions. Just think: an amazing performance would be a surefire way to prove you can do better than your GPA suggests! Just ... a ... little ... longer! Do You Need More Time to Prove Yourself? // If you just need a little more time to demonstrate what you can do, think about applying to a less competitive campus of a state university system. You can then transfer to a more rigorous campus in the same system. Below is our list of the least competitive campuses in larger and more competitive state university systems. In this chart, we've included the average GPA of admitted applicants as well as the current acceptance rate for each school. (Pro tip: click the school names to see your chances of getting in with our Admissions Calculator!) School Average GPA Admission Rate Indiana University Northwest 2.96 79% Louisiana State University Shreveport 3.29 81% Penn State Schuylkill 2.90 73% Rutgers Camden 3.30 58% SUNY Potsdam 3.29 74% Texas AM Kingsville 3.35 82% University of Arkansas at Little Rock 3.21 59% University of Colorado at Colorado Springs 3.37 91% University of Illinois at Chicago 3.25 77% University of Louisiana at Monroe 3.41 94% University of Maine at Presque Isle 3.04 77% University of Maryland Eastern Shore 2.80 57% University of Massachusetts Dartmouth 3.20 76% University of Michigan at Flint 3.29 74% University of Minnesota Crookston 3.21 78% University of Missouri Kansas City 3.36 63% University of Nebraska at Kearney 3.47 85% University of North Carolina at Pembroke 3.40 74% University of Pittsburgh at Bradford 3.22 58% University of South Carolina Beaufort 3.39 63% University of Tennessee at Chattanooga 3.48 79% University of Texas at Brownsville 3.09 87% University of Washington Tacoma 3.23 83% University of Wisconsin Milwaukee 3.10 73% A name-brand school = a little bling for your resume. // Do You Want a Name-Brand School? If you would still like to go to a high-profile school but don’t see yourself transferring, state colleges are your best bet. Check out these accessible state college systems with fairly low GPA requirements on all of their campuses: California State University Connecticut State University University of Hawaii Massachusetts State University University of Nevada The CUNY system in NYC The Oregon University system (not to be confused with the University of Oregon) University of Rhode Island // I'll just point my protractor at a random point on this globe and go to college there! List of Colleges With Low GPAs by State If you have an idea of where you want to end up geographically speaking, then you're in luck. Here is a comprehensive list of colleges sorted by state. For each state, the schools are listed alphabetically and are accompanied by their average GPAs for admitted applicants. Alabama Alabama State University 2.80 Auburn University at Montgomery 3.30 Faulkner University 3.26 Jacksonville State University 3.34 Oakwood University 2.99 Southeastern Bible College 3.34 Tuskegee University 3.10 University of North Alabama 3.40 Alaska University of Alaska Fairbanks 3.21 University of Alaska Southeast 2.94 Arizona Prescott College 3.17 Arkansas Arkansas Tech University 3.19 Henderson State University 3.21 Southern Arkansas University 3.26 University of Arkansas at Little Rock 3.21 University of Central Arkansas 3.36 University of the Ozarks 3.23 // California American Jewish University 3.11 California Baptist University 3.32 California College of the Arts 3.27 California State University Bakersfield 3.20 California State University Chico 3.27 California State University Dominguez Hills 3.13 California State University East Bay 3.10 California State University Fresno 3.07 California State University Los Angeles 3.21 California State University Monterey Bay 3.32 California State University Northridge 3.18 California State University Sacramento 3.27 California State University San Bernardino 3.21 California State University San Marcos 3.27 California State University Stanislaus 3.31 Fresno Pacific University 3.30 Holy Names University 3.16 Humboldt State University 3.26 La Sierra University 3.39 Menlo College 3.30 Notre Dame de Namur University 3.20 Otis College of Art and Design 3.17 Pacific Union College 3.23 San Francisco Art Institute 3.22 San Francisco State University 3.23 Sonoma State University 3.24 Vanguard University of Southern California 3.21 Woodbury University 3.34 Colorado Adams State College 3.11 Colorado Mesa University 3.10 Fort Lewis College 3.25 Metropolitan State University of Denver 2.90 University of Colorado Colorado Springs 3.37 University of Northern Colorado 3.23 Western State Colorado University 2.87 Connecticut Albertus Magnus College 2.60 Central Connecticut State University 3.00 Eastern Connecticut State University 3.08 Lyme Academy College of Fine Arts 3.22 Sacred Heart University 3.42 Southern Connecticut State University 2.90 University of Bridgeport 2.93 University of Saint Joseph 3.24 Western Connecticut State University 2.97 Delaware Catholic University of America 3.38 Delaware State University 3.11 Goldey-Beacom College 2.90 Wesley College 2.71 Florida Barry University 3.14 Beacon College 2.87 Bethune-Cookman University 2.96 Clearwater Christian College 3.32 Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University 3.36 Johnson Wales University 3.06 Lynn University 3.07 Ringling College of Art and Design 3.27 Rollins College 3.33 Trinity College of Florida 3.17 University of Tampa 3.40 Webber International University 2.83 Georgia Albany State University 2.92 Armstrong Atlantic State University 3.24 Brewton-Parker College 3.04 Clark Atlanta University 3.00 Clayton State University 3.05 Columbus State University 3.12 Dalton State College 3.10 Georgia Gwinnett College 2.78 Georgia Southern University 3.29 Georgia Southwestern State University 3.26 Kennesaw State University 3.25 Life University 3.15 Morehouse College 3.11 Paine College 2.95 Point University 3.15 Reinhardt University 3.11 Savannah State University 2.77 Shorter University 3.35 Southern Polytechnic State University 3.28 Valdosta State University 3.20 University of West Georgia 3.15 Hawaii Chaminade University of Honolulu 3.41 University of Hawaii at Hilo 3.36 Idaho Idaho State University 3.23 Lewis-Clark State College 3.10 Illinois Augustana College 3.29 Blackburn College 3.28 Columbia College Chicago 3.26 Concordia University Chicago 2.98 Eastern Illinois University 3.08 Elmhurst College 3.38 Eureka College 3.20 Judson University 3.39 Kendall College 2.82 Lincoln Christian University 2.80 MacMurray College 3.00 Monmouth College 3.30 North Park University 3.14 Northeastern Illinois University 2.80 Northern Illinois University 3.15 Robert Morris University 3.48 Rockford University 3.18 Roosevelt University 3.16 Shimer College 2.99 Southern Illinois University Carbondale 3.09 University of Illinois at Chicago 3.25 Western Illinois University 3.20 // Indiana Calumet College of St. Joseph 2.63 Holy Cross College 3.20 Indiana Institute of Technology 2.93 Indiana State University 3.07 Indiana University East 3.17 Indiana University Kokomo 3.14 Indiana University Northwest 2.96 Indiana University- Purdue University Fort Wayne 3.20 Indiana University- Purdue University Indianapolis 3.39 Indiana University South Bend 3.09 Indiana University Southeast 3.12 Oakland City University 3.15 Purdue University Calumet 3.13 Purdue University North Central 3.04 St. Joseph's College 3.19 Saint Mary-of-the-Woods College 3.23 University of Southern Indiana 3.27 Iowa Briar Cliff University 3.27 Emmaus Bible College 3.18 Graceland University 3.22 Grand View University 3.23 Iowa Wesleyan College 3.02 Maharishi University of Management 3.14 St. Ambrose University 3.26 University of Dubuque 2.95 Upper Iowa University 3.19 Waldorf College 3.00 Kansas Bethany College 2.85 Emporia State University 3.32 Fort Hays State University 3.37 Friends University 3.29 Pittsburg State University 3.30 Sterling College 3.10 Tabor College 3.33 University of St. Mary 3.31 Kentucky Campbellsville University 3.35 Eastern Kentucky University 3.29 Georgetown College 3.37 Kentucky Christian University 3.16 Kentucky Mountain Bible College 3.39 Kentucky State University 2.78 Kentucky Wesleyan College 3.30 Lindsey Wilson College 3.27 Midway College 3.19 Northern Kentucky University 3.34 Thomas More College 3.26 University of the Cumberlands 3.44 University of Pikeville 3.06 Western Kentucky University 3.27 // Louisiana Dillard University 2.78 Grambling State University 2.72 Louisiana College 3.17 Louisiana State University Shreveport 3.29 Nicholls State University 3.22 Northwestern State University of Louisiana 3.24 Southeastern Louisiana University 3.19 University of Louisiana at Lafayette 3.30 University of New Orleans 3.14 Maine Husson University 3.30 University of Maine 3.27 University of Maine at Farmington 2.97 University of Maine at Fort Kent 3.00 University of New England 3.30 University of Southern Maine 2.96 Maryland Frostburg State University 3.18 Goucher College 3.15 Morgan State University 3.00 Stevenson University 3.40 University of Baltimore 2.89 University of Maryland Eastern Shore 2.80 Massachusetts American International College 2.80 Anna Maria College 2.78 Assumption College 3.38 Bay Path College 3.21 Becker College 3.08 Bridgewater State University 3.14 Curry College 2.80 Eastern Nazarene College 3.00 Endicott College 3.27 Fitchburg State University 3.10 Framingham State University 3.08 Hellenic College Holy Cross Greek Orthodox School of Theology 3.40 Lasell College 2.96 Lesley University 3.31 Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts 3.10 Massachusetts Maritime Academy 3.14 Mount Ida College 2.60 Newbury College 2.45 Nichols College 2.80 Regis College 3.06 Salem State University 3.13 Wentworth Institute of Technology 3.10 Western New England University 3.38 Westfield State University 3.09 Wheelock College 2.88 Worcester State University 3.23 Michigan Central Michigan University 3.37 College for Creative Studies 3.19 Concordia University Ann Arbor 3.10 Eastern Michigan University 3.30 Kuyper College 3.26 Lake Superior State University 3.26 Madonna University 3.30 Marygrove College 2.67 Northern Michigan University 3.16 Northwood University 3.16 Siena Heights University 3.20 University of Michigan- Flint 3.29 Wayne State University 3.30 Western Michigan University 3.34 // Minnesota Bemidji State University 3.11 Bethany Lutheran College 3.39 Concordia University Saint Paul 3.13 Minneapolis College of Art and Design 3.25 North Central University 3.33 St. Cloud State University 3.12 University of Minnesota, Crookston 3.21 Winona State University 3.33 Mississippi Alcorn State University 2.98 Belhaven University 3.30 Delta State University 3.10 Jackson State University 3.03 Mississippi State University 3.32 Mississippi Valley State University 2.91 Rust College 2.34 University of Southern Mississippi 3.27 Missouri Avila University 3.34 Culver-Stockton College 3.12 Harris-Stowe State University 2.69 Kansas City Art Institute 3.30 Lincoln University 2.63 Lindenwood University 3.21 Missouri Southern State University 3.30 Missouri Western State University 3.32 St. Louis Christian College 3.00 Southeast Missouri State University 3.39 Stephens College 3.27 University of Central Missouri 3.35 University of Missouri- Kansas City 3.36 Montana Montana State University 3.36 Montana State University- Billings 3.14 Rocky Mountain College 3.35 University of Great Falls 3.28 University of Montana Western 3.07 Want to build the best possible college application with a low GPA? We can help. PrepScholar Admissions is the world's best admissions consulting service. We combine world-class admissions counselors with our data-driven, proprietary admissions strategies. We've overseen thousands of students get into their top choice schools, from state colleges to the Ivy League. We know what kinds of students colleges want to admit. We want to get you admitted to your dream schools. Learn more about PrepScholar Admissions to maximize your chance of getting in. Nebraska Wayne State College 3.20 Nevada Sierra Nevada College 3.08 University of Nevada, Las Vegas 3.28 New Hampshire Colby Sawyer College 3.21 New England College 2.59 Plymouth State University 2.96 Rivier University 3.19 Saint Anselm College 3.28 Southern New Hampshire University 3.06 New Jersey Bloomfield College 2.68 Fairleigh Dickinson University- College at Florham 3.07 Fairleigh Dickinson University- Metropolitan Campus 3.08 Felician College 3.05 Kean University 3.10 Montclair State University 3.20 Ramapo College of New Jersey 3.26 Rider University 3.28 Saint Peter's University 3.15 William Paterson University 3.08 New Mexico Eastern New Mexico University 3.19 New Mexico Highlands University 2.95 University of New Mexico 3.38 // New York Alfred University 3.03 Cazenovia College 3.20 College of Mount St. Vincent 3.12 Culinary Institute of America 3.16 CUNY College of Staten Island 3.06 CUNY Hunter College 3.20 CUNY John Jay College of Criminal Justice 2.84 Dominican College 2.96 Elmira College 3.28 Farmingdale State College 3.24 Hartwick College 3.16 Hilbert College 3.18 Hobart and William Smith Colleges 3.43 Iona College 2.96 Keuka College 3.10 Long Island University Brooklyn 2.98 Long Island University Post 3.11 Manhattanville College 3.10 Marist College 3.30 Mercy College 3.00 Molloy College 3.00 Mount St. Mary College 3.20 Nyack College 2.81 Pace University 3.26 School of Visual Arts 3.29 St. Bonaventure University 3.40 St. Joseph's College- Brooklyn Campus 3.20 SUNY College at Brockport 2.98 SUNY Buffalo State 3.15 SUNY College at Old Westbury 3.10 SUNY Plattsburgh 3.20 SUNY Potsdam 3.29 SUNY at Purchase (Purchase College) 3.10 Utica College 3.09 North Carolina Barton College 3.18 Belmont Abbey College 3.16 Brevard College 3.07 Chowan University 2.69 Fayetteville State University 3.20 Guilford College 3.19 Johnson C. Smith University 2.78 Lees-McRae College 3.29 Mars Hill University 3.24 Meredith College 3.35 Methodist University 3.28 Mid-Atlantic Christian University 2.91 Montreat College 3.07 North Carolina AT State University 2.48 North Carolina Central University 3.20 Saint Augustine's University 2.37 Shaw University 2.45 University of North Carolina at Pembroke 3.40 William Peace University 3.22 Winston-Salem State University 3.01 North Dakota Jamestown College 3.46 Mayville State University 2.99 Minot State University 3.36 Valley City State University 3.18 Ohio Ashland University 3.44 Bluffton University 3.16 Bowling Green State University 3.30 Central State University 2.50 Cincinnati Christian University 3.14 Cleveland State University 3.29 College of Mount St. Joseph 3.35 Columbus College of Art and Design 3.15 Defiance College 3.22 Heidelberg University 3.28 Kent State University at Kent 3.36 Lourdes University 3.17 Malone University 3.33 Muskingum University 3.26 Tiffin University 3.07 University of Akron 3.16 University of Mount Union 3.44 University of Rio Grande 3.06 University of Toledo 3.32 Urbana University 3.00 Wilmington College 3.20 Wright State University 3.26 Youngstown State University 3.13 Oklahoma Cameron University 3.14 East Central University 3.40 Northeastern State University 3.37 Northwestern Oklahoma State University 3.28 St. Gregory's University 3.29 Southeastern Oklahoma State University 3.31 University of Central Oklahoma 3.29 Oregon Eastern Oregon University 3.29 Southern Oregon University 3.31 Warner Pacific College 3.17 Western Oregon University 3.24 Pennsylvania Albright College 3.40 Alvernia University 3.34 Baptist Bible College and Seminary 3.31 Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania 3.27 Cabrini College 3.06 Cairn University 3.24 California University of Pennsylvania 3.10 Cedar Crest College 3.17 Chestnut Hill College 3.13 Cheyney University of Pennsylvania 2.37 Clarion University of Pennsylvania 3.21 Edinboro University of Pennsylvania 3.18 Gwynedd-Mercy College 3.22 Holy Family University 3.09 Immaculata University 3.26 Kutztown University of Pennsylvania 3.20 La Roche College 3.30 La Salle University 3.35 Lock Haven University 3.30 Mansfield University of Pennsylvania 3.33 Misericordia University 3.35 Morris College 2.50 Mount Aloysius College 3.20 Muhlenberg College 3.30 Neumann University 3.04 Penn State Abington 3.11 Penn State Altoona 3.05 Penn State Berks 3.06 Penn State Erie, The Behrend College 3.30 Penn State Harrisburg 3.14 Penn State Lehigh Valley 3.03 Penn State Schuylkill 2.90 Point Park University 3.22 Rosemont College 3.40 Shippensburg University of Pennsylvania 3.20 Susquehanna University 3.46 Thiel College 3.10 University of Pittsburgh Bradford 3.22 Washington Jefferson College 3.39 Rhode Island Bryant University 3.42 Roger Williams University 3.34 Salve Regina University 3.29 University of Rhode Island 3.46 South Carolina Claflin University 3.28 Erskine College and Seminary 3.31 Limestone College 3.24 South Carolina State University 2.79 University of South Carolina Beaufort 3.39 Voorhees College 2.00 // South Dakota Dakota State University 3.10 Northern State University 3.25 South Dakota State University 3.37 Tennessee Austin Peay State University 3.20 Cumberland University 3.30 East Tennessee State University 3.40 Fisk University 3.10 Johnson University 3.06 LeMoyne-Owen College 2.50 Lane College 2.42 Memphis College of Art 3.14 Tennessee State University 2.82 Tennessee Wesleyan College 3.42 Trevecca Nazarene University 3.39 Tusculum College 3.13 University of Memphis 3.42 Watkins College of Art, Design and Film 3.00 Texas Arlington Baptist College 2.88 Concordia University Texas 3.30 East Texas Baptist University 3.38 Huston Tillotson University 2.79 Paul Quinn College 2.60 Prairie View AM University 3.03 Southwestern Adventist University 3.20 Sul Ross State University 3.17 Texas AM University- Kingsville 3.35 Texas Southern University 2.84 Texas Wesleyan University 3.40 Texas Woman's University 3.08 Wayland Baptist University 3.28 Utah Dixie State College 3.22 Neumont University 3.20 Weber State University 3.29 Vermont Castleton State College 3.00 Champlain College 3.20 Green Mountain College 3.04 Marlboro College 3.23 Norwich University 3.07 Southern Vermont College 2.50 Vermont Technical College 3.02 Virginia Averett University 3.17 Bluefield College 3.29 Ferrum College 2.88 Hampton University 3.22 Lynchburg College 3.41 Mary Baldwin College 3.43 Marymount University 3.24 Norfolk State University 2.90 Old Dominion University 3.28 Radford University 3.20 Virginia State University 2.90 Virginia Union University 2.71 Virginia Wesleyan College 3.28 Washington Central Washington University 3.14 Eastern Washington University 3.21 Evergreen State College 3.04 University of Washington Bothell 3.28 University of Washington Tacoma 3.23 Washington State University 3.31 West Virginia Alderson-Broaddus College 3.20 Bethany College 2.85 Concord University 3.31 Davis and Elkins College 2.90 Fairmont State University 3.29 Ohio Valley University 2.85 Shepherd University 3.31 West Liberty University 3.35 West Virginia State University 3.08 West Virginia University Institute of Technology 3.35 Wisconsin Cardinal Stritch University 3.22 Carroll University 3.30 Carthage College 3.24 Edgewood College 3.40 Lakeland College 3.00 Milwaukee Institute of Art Design 3.07 Mount Mary University 3.12 Northland College 3.40 Silver Lake College of the Holy Family 2.73 University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee 3.10 University of Wisconsin- Oshkosh 3.30 University of Wisconsin- Parkside 3.03 University of Wisconsin- Stout 3.30 University of Wisconsin- Superior 3.12 University of Wisconsin- Whitewater 3.29 // The Final Word: Colleges With Low GPA Requirements As you can see, a low GPA- usually one around 3.0 or lower- doesn't have to disqualify you from some great colleges. In fact, many schools with low GPA requirements are popular, well-known state universities. By contrast, if you're a fan of smaller colleges, there are plenty of those, too, you can consider. In addition, no matter where you are in the US, more than likely there's a school with low GPA requirements in or near the area you live (except Wyoming- sorry, guys!). Some states in the list above have far more schools than others; this is likely a result of population differences. Finally, remember that even if your GPA is lower than what your school expects, you can increase your chance of acceptance by getting a high SAT/ACT score and submitting a great application! What’s Next? What's a good GPA? A bad GPA?Here's a complete guide. // Want to see colleges that are even easier to get into? Take a look at our list of schools that admit almost everyone. You know your GPA, but do you know your target test scores? Figure out what your target SAT or target ACT score should be for the colleges you're interested in. Ready to learn more about the application process? Check out this handy infographic that lays it all out in detail.

Econometrics assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Econometrics - Assignment Example In this case, the cumulative probability is 0.7049. This implies that the coefficient is at least -20 (100 - 70.5) = 29.5% of the time. We now test the probability that the obtained t-score with 11982 degrees of freedom is greater than 0.5385. Using the t-tables, we obtain the one-tailed p-value as 0.2951. Since this value is greater than the default level of significance (0.05) for the test, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. We establish that the value of the coefficient is not greater than -20 at the 5% level of significance. From the equations, we now determine whether students whose home language is not English are more or less likely to read fiction compared to those who read fiction at home. Firstly, we realize that the introduction of the variable â€Å"fiction† in the second model improves the value of R2 from 0.02 to 0.204. This indicates that the variable alone accounts for (0.204 – 0.02) = 18.4% of the variability in the reading scores. We take the â€Å"odds ratio† approach. We apply the formula: Again, nearly everyone in the sample who does not speak English at home reads fiction. The ratio of fiction readers from the two categorizations is 1:1, implying neither of the groups commands higher fiction reading likelihoods than the other. In the variable â€Å"fiction† were to be split into constituent components based on the likert scale rankings earlier used, such that â€Å"fict5† indicates â€Å"I like reading fiction very much† and so on, we would have to change the variable responses from scale to dummies. We assume that if an individual who, say responding to â€Å"fict5† mentions that they â€Å"do not like reading fiction very much† will be accorded 0 for the response, and 1 for â€Å"I like reading fiction very much†. The variable â€Å"fict3† is the transition between responses that affirm or disaffirm the proposal/ question. This is highlighted by the fact that the scale used has 5 points, providing for